The Corona 19 pandemic has changed many standards and rules in the world. The same goes for football. A typical example is the expansion of game entries. On the day of the game, there is a possibility that a player infected with corona may occur, so in addition to the 11 starting players, additional players who can play are secured. As the number of replacements increased to 5, the atmosphere was increased from 7 to 9 on the bench.
It is an atmosphere where the corona pandemic is ending, but the changed standards are not going back to before. In Europe, Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga, etc. are maintaining the number of people on standby, which has increased to nine. In the UEFA Champions League, 11 people sit on the bench. Serie A had the foresight. Before the corona, I was able to seat all the players except for the 11 starting players among the registered players in the 1st team. It is a league where you can see a waiting list of 14 players, which is more than the starting number.
The selection of the World Cup, which serves as a model for world soccer, was no different. FIFA increased the number of entries for each country from 23 to 26 for the normal operation of the tournament. All 15 other than 11 were able to sit on the bench. At first, it was a way to hold the competition normally in the midst of the corona crisis, but the more you get used to it, the more diverse situations come out, and the positive perception is increasing. It is highly likely that the same rules will be applied in the next World Cup.
The K-League has maintained a seven-member system after increasing the number of people on standby from six to one in 2010. In the situation of the corona pandemic, the number of replacements was expanded to 5, but the number of people on standby remained the same. The J-League is also maintaining the number of people on standby at 7 so far.
Will we ride the tide of change or will we go our way? The Professional Football Federation has also been deeply concerned about this since the end of last year. Various opinions are being collected from the relevant department, centered on Technical Committee Chairperson Park Tae-ha. While listening to the opinions of the leaders in the field, we are also listening to the voice of the club administration, which is the main body of operation.
The reaction of the club front desk, which is responsible for administration, is negative to the expansion. It is known that about 70% of a total of 25 teams in the K-League 1 and 2 opposed it. 토토사이트 The biggest reason is the financial burden due to increased costs. As the total number of players preparing for the game expands from 18 to 20, it is predicted that the annual amount that clubs will have to bear will increase from 200 million won to 300 million won. It is not a fatal level considering the operating costs of each club, but in a situation where revenue growth is at a standstill, there were many feedbacks asking whether the system change is beneficial enough to cost new money.
The reaction of the directors was the opposite. majority are in favor Some opposing opinions were also in the position that they could be conditionally approved as there were concerns.
Director Hong Myung-bo was in the position that we should follow the flow of change. He said, “FIFA and European football are already going in that direction. Now, it is not a temporary measure due to Corona, but a new standard. There is no reason for the K-League not to follow it.” FC Seoul coach Ahn Ik-soo paid attention to the increase in opportunities. “Fans want to see as many players on the field as possible,” coach Ahn said. The door to opportunities to be rewarded for sweating can also widen.”